What Are the Problems With Public Transportation?

Public transportation is central to people's movement through cities, towns, and rural areas. Yet, despite its essential role, there are many persistent problems with it.

These issues, from outdated infrastructure and underfunded networks to accessibility gaps and environmental concerns, shape how well transit systems serve the public.

In many regions, public transit is pressured to do more with less. Ridership has fluctuated, operating costs have risen, and communities continue to call for better service.

For example, local bus services are facing a critical decline in use and weakening commercial viability, with passenger numbers and network strength under increasing strain. Without effective solutions, millions of people remain dependent on systems that may not meet their daily needs.

Understanding these challenges in detail is crucial for developing effective, sustainable, and equitable transportation solutions.

Ageing Systems and Underfunded Networks

Many public transit systems in major cities operate on decades-old infrastructure. Rail lines, bus fleets, and signalling equipment often require expensive upgrades that are delayed due to funding shortages.

In some US states, such as New York and California, deferred maintenance has left services vulnerable to frequent breakdowns and safety risks, with ageing rail and subway networks often requiring costly emergency repairs.

For example, the American Society of Civil Engineers consistently gives low grades to the condition of US transit infrastructure, with the 2025 Report Card awarding transit a “D” grade due to ageing assets, funding shortfalls, and growing demand.

Underfunding creates a cycle where unreliable services drive down ridership, making it harder to justify investment in improvements.

Inflexible Fixed Routes and Timetables

While fixed-route transit remains the backbone of many successful public transport systems, particularly in dense urban environments, its structure can make adaptation difficult when travel patterns evolve.

Fixed routes are highly efficient when demand is concentrated, but in lower-density areas or shifting commuter landscapes, their rigidity can limit coverage and flexibility.

Integrating more adaptable services alongside fixed routes can help maintain efficiency while meeting emerging mobility needs.

In suburban and low-density areas, fixed routes often fail to provide convenient coverage, resulting in long walks to bus stops or infrequent service that discourages use. During off-peak hours, services are frequently reduced, leaving passengers with little choice but to rely on private cars.

Flexibility is especially crucial today, where hybrid work models and irregular schedules are common, making adaptable solutions such as demand-responsive or microtransit services increasingly relevant.

Congestion and Delays in Urban Areas

Urban transport is heavily affected by road congestion. Buses share lanes with private vehicles, leading to delays during peak hours. Even high-capacity rail systems experience crowding, causing discomfort and slower boarding.

In London and New York, rush-hour crowding leads to severe bottlenecks, with platforms and carriages reaching unsafe capacity levels. In New York, for example, limited platform capacity means station platforms become crowded even during minor service disruptions.

For commuters in large cities, delays are compounded by high demand, strained capacity, and inadequate system expansions to keep pace with population growth.

The result is not just frustration but measurable productivity loss when workers travel longer daily.

‍

Accessibility and Equity Challenges

Persistent accessibility gaps and inequities prevent many groups from relying on public transport, limiting mobility and deepening social divides.

Gaps in Rural and Underserved Communities

Rural and low-density areas face the most significant barriers to public transit access. Sparse networks, infrequent services, and limited funding mean many residents lack reliable transport, restricting access to jobs, education, and healthcare.

In the United States, fewer than 60 per cent of rural counties have public transit services of any kind. Those who do often rely on a single bus line operating only a few days a week. Without reliable connections, social isolation and economic inequality deepen.

Solutions such as improving public transport in rural areas demonstrate how flexible, locally tailored approaches can close accessibility gaps and better serve remote communities.

Limited Options for Elderly and Mobility-Impaired Riders

Accessibility remains a critical challenge. Many transit systems are not fully compliant with mobility needs, leaving gaps for elderly riders or those with disabilities.

Broken lifts, poorly designed stations, and limited bus seating make it difficult for some people to travel independently.

For instance, while rail services in Europe often provide step-free access, many US stations still lack elevators or ramps. Even when vehicles are designed for accessibility, inconsistent maintenance can render equipment unusable.

Without consistent investment in accessibility, equity in transit remains out of reach.

Safety and Reliability Concerns

Passenger confidence in services depends on both safety and reliability. Issues such as poorly lit stations, lack of staff presence, or inconsistent service undermine trust in the system. In certain city environments, perceptions of safety on late-night travel can deter ridership.

Reliability also plays a major role. Riders often seek alternatives when buses or trains fail to arrive on time. In surveys, reliability is consistently ranked as the top factor influencing whether people use public transport.

Safety concerns further compound the problem, with vulnerable groups often avoiding public transit altogether during certain times of day.

‍

Environmental and Sustainability Issues

Public transport systems also face mounting environmental challenges, from high emissions in legacy fleets to the urgent need for cleaner, more sustainable models.

Dependence on Fossil Fuels in Legacy Fleets

Many buses and trains in operation today are powered by diesel or other fossil fuels. This dependence contributes significantly to urban air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

According to the International Energy Agency, the transport sector accounts for around 24 per cent of global CO₂ emissions, with road vehicles making up the majority.

The transition to electric or hydrogen fleets has begun, but upgrading entire fleets requires high investment and long-term commitment: smaller agencies and rural services in particular struggle to adopt cleaner technologies without government subsidies or incentives.

Low Ridership and Empty Buses Are Increasing Emissions

Paradoxically, poorly designed transit networks can harm the environment. When ridership is low, buses often run nearly empty, wasting energy and growing emissions per passenger. In such cases, private vehicles may even prove more efficient.

For example, in many cities worldwide, buses run with very low occupancy during off-peak hours. Studies in European cities show that underused routes and limited demand outside peak periods significantly increasing emissions per passenger compared to fuller services.

This highlights the need to design smarter systems that balance demand with frequency, ensuring environmental benefits are realised.

The Need for Greener, Shared Mobility Solutions

To address these sustainability issues, community transport and other shared models are increasingly important. Shared mobility solutions like ride-sharing and carpooling offer practical ways to reduce single-occupancy vehicle use. While not a substitute for public transport, these services can complement existing networks by filling coverage gaps and encouraging more efficient use of road space, particularly in areas where frequent bus or rail services are not viable.

Shared mobility options such as ride-sharing and carpooling offer practical ways to reduce single-occupancy vehicle use. While not a substitute for public transport, these services can complement existing networks by filling coverage gaps and encouraging more efficient use of road space, particularly in areas where frequent bus or rail services are not viable.

Shared mobility options such as ride-sharing and carpooling offer practical ways to reduce single-occupancy vehicle use. While not a substitute for public transport, these services can complement existing networks by filling coverage gaps and encouraging more efficient use of road space, particularly in areas where frequent bus or rail services are not viable.

Greener transit is not just about replacing fuels but rethinking how services are delivered. By encouraging modal shifts to shared mobility, integrating active travel options, and leveraging data-driven planning, cities can create transport networks that align with climate goals.

‍

Economic and Policy Barriers

Economic pressures and fragmented policies continue to limit the stability and growth of public transport systems.

Rising Costs of Operating Public Transit

Operating public transport systems is expensive, from staffing and maintenance to energy costs. As fare revenues fluctuate—especially after the pandemic, systems rely more heavily on subsidies.

In the US, all responding agencies represent nearly $32 billion of approximately $50 billion in total fiscal year transit industry operating expenses. Balancing affordability for passengers with financial sustainability for operators is one of the hardest challenges to resolve.

Raising fares risks excluding low-income riders, while insufficient subsidies can force service cuts.

Policy Misalignment Across Agencies and Regions

In many urban and regional networks, multiple agencies oversee different services, leading to fragmented planning and competition for resources. Policy misalignment results in duplicated routes or gaps where agencies fail to coordinate.

For example, the San Francisco Bay Area has more than two dozen transit agencies, each with its own policies, schedules, and ticketing systems. Passengers often have to navigate a patchwork of services instead of a seamless journey. Integrated planning is critical to avoid inefficiencies and confusion.

Lack of Innovation in Traditional Funding Models

Traditional funding often relies on a mix of fares, state budgets, and local taxes. This leaves transit vulnerable to political shifts and economic downturns.

Some cities have experimented with public-private partnerships, congestion pricing, or dedicated transit taxes, but adoption remains uneven.

Without innovation in funding models, systems risk stagnation, and are unable to finance the modernisation required to keep pace with demand.

‍

How Technology Can Solve Public Transportation Problems

Emerging technologies offer practical tools to make public transport more flexible, efficient, and responsive to changing passenger needs.

Demand-Responsive Transport (DRT)

Demand-responsive transport adjusts routes and schedules dynamically to match passenger needs. By offering flexible pick-up and drop-off points, DRT provides efficient coverage in areas underserved by fixed routes.

In the UK, pilot DRT services have shown strong potential to reduce wait times and improve access in rural counties. By pooling rides, agencies can provide cost-effective services that adapt to fluctuating demand while reducing the need for underused fixed routes.

Microtransit

Microtransit bridges the gap between buses and taxis by operating on flexible routes with smaller vehicles. These services combine the efficiency of public systems with the convenience of ride-hailing apps.

In cities like Los Angeles, microtransit pilots have demonstrated how technology can reduce congestion while providing more responsive service. Smaller vehicles are also easier to electrify, further supporting sustainability goals.

Carpooling Platforms

Carpooling addresses one of public transport’s key challenges — limited coverage and flexibility.

In areas where fixed routes or timetables don’t meet commuters’ needs, carpool platforms provide a practical bridge by reducing single-occupancy car use and easing pressure on overstretched networks.

Liftango’s carpool solutions demonstrate how technology can fill these gaps by connecting riders travelling in the same direction, creating shared journeys that reduce congestion, costs, and emissions while complementing existing public transport systems.

Mobility-As-A-Service (MaaS)

Mobility-as-a-service integrates different transport modes into a single platform, such as buses, trains, car share, and bike hire. By simplifying trip planning, payment, and access, MaaS removes barriers to multimodal journeys and encourages people to choose sustainable options over private cars.

SkedGo is a leading Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) platform that enables users to plan, book, and pay for multimodal journeys within a single app. By integrating multiple transport modes into one seamless experience, SkedGo creates more convenient and sustainable alternatives to private car ownership.

‍

The Future of Public Transportation With Liftango

Liftango’s work with communities and agencies shows how tailored, data-driven solutions can shape more sustainable and equitable transit systems.

Case Studies From Rural and Urban Communities

Liftango has supported innovative solutions that transform both rural and urban mobility. In underserved areas, DRT projects have shown how shared rides can unlock accessibility and economic opportunity. A great example is Fife Council’s modernisation of rural transport, which used Liftango’s on-demand platform to increase local trip volumes by 50% and improve access for remote communities.    

In cities, partnerships with employers and transport agencies have helped reduce congestion while improving employee commutes.

This case study highlights the importance of tailoring solutions to local needs. A one-size-fits-all model cannot adequately serve the diverse requirements of high-density urban areas and sparsely populated rural regions.

Building Sustainable, Equitable Mobility Systems

The future of transportation lies in designing systems that are sustainable, equitable, and inclusive. Liftango’s projects emphasise collaboration with local authorities to develop integrated networks.

These solutions prove that public transport can be both environmentally friendly and accessible to all by combining data-driven insights with flexible models.

The goal is to move people efficiently and support healthier, more connected communities.

‍

Learn More About Public Transportation

There are proven ways to tackle these challenges for organisations, governments, and communities seeking to reimagine mobility.

To explore innovative options, visit our public transport hub or contact us directly to discuss tailored solutions that meet your needs.

‍

Public Transportation FAQs

What Are the Biggest Problems With Public Transportation Today?

The biggest problems include ageing infrastructure, underfunding, accessibility gaps, rising operating costs, and environmental impacts. Policy misalignment and inconsistent services across regions also contribute to inefficiencies.

‍

How Can Technology Help Solve Public Transportation Challenges?

Technology enables more flexible and efficient services. Tools such as microtransit, DRT, and MaaS platforms optimise routes, improve accessibility, and encourage shared, sustainable modes of travel.

Why Is Public Transportation Less Accessible in Rural Communities?

Low population density and limited funding make it difficult to maintain frequent, reliable services in rural areas. Innovative approaches such as demand-responsive and community transport are key to bridging these gaps.